Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Commitments and Contingencies

v2.4.1.9
Commitments and Contingencies
9 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies
Note 15 - Commitments and Contingencies
Refer to Note 14 - Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2014 Form 10-K for information on all commitments.
Contingent production payments. In September 2011, the Company entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Nautilus PSA") among the Company and the non-controlling interest owners of NP for the Company's acquisition of the sellers' interests in NP. The Nautilus PSA provides for potential future contingent production payments, payable by the Company in cash to the sellers, of up to a total of $5.0 million if certain increased average daily production rates for the underlying properties are achieved. J. Thomas Wilson, a director and executive officer of the Company, has an approximately 52% interest in such contingent payments. See Note 7 - Fair Value Measurements above for information regarding the estimated discounted fair value of the future contingent consideration payable related to the Nautilus PSA.
Sopak Collateral Agreement. On January 14, 2013, the Company entered into a Collateral Purchase Agreement (the "Collateral Agreement") with Sopak AG, a Swiss subsidiary of Glencore International plc ("Sopak"), pursuant to which the Company agreed to purchase: (i) 9,264,637 shares of the Company's Common Stock and (ii) a warrant granting Sopak the right to purchase from the Company an additional 4,347,826 shares of Common Stock. The Collateral Agreement was subsequently amended on January 15, 2013, and completed on January 16, 2013. The Company has estimated that there is the potential for a statutory liability of approximately $1,650 thousand and $1,571 thousand as of March 31, 2015, and June 30, 2014, respectively, related to US Federal tax withholdings and related penalties and interest related to the Collateral Agreement. As a result, we have recorded a total liability of $1,650 thousand and $1,571 thousand as of March 31, 2015, and June 30, 2014, respectively, under accrued and other liabilities in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets included in this report. The Company has a legally enforceable right to collect from Sopak any amounts owed to the IRS as a result of the Collateral Agreement. As a result, we have recorded a corresponding receivable of $1,650 thousand and $1,571 thousand as of March 31, 2015, and June 30, 2014, respectively, under prepaid and other assets in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Broadford Bridge-1 Well. As previously reported, during the three months ended December 31, 2014, the Company received a cash call from Celtique for the advancement of estimated expenses in the amount of approximately $2,000 thousand in connection with the Broadford Bridge-1 well, and the Company is evaluating its alternatives under the applicable joint operating agreement. On March 3, 2015, MPUK received a claim form and particulars of claim issued in the High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court in London, England on February 26, 2015, pursuant to which Celtique Energie Weald Limited as the claimant seeks, among other things, a declaration that MPUK’s 50% equal co-ownership rights with Celtique in PEDLs 231, 234 (within which license area the Broadford Bridge-1 well site is located), and 243 in the central Weald Basin in the UK have been forfeited to Celtique, and payment of £1,540 thousand (equivalent to $2,284 thousand as of March 31, 2015) for the outstanding cash calls along with interest on that amount at 5% above base rate until payment. On April 1, 2015, MPUK filed a defense and counterclaim asserting, among other things, that the cash calls by Celtique are not valid due to the failure of Celtique as operator of the PEDLs to comply with the contractual accounting procedures, adhere to an agreed-upon drilling schedule and otherwise properly execute the parties’ development plans, and seeking to recover damages from Celtique as a result of Celtique’s unilateral actions following the purported forfeiture of the PEDL interests. MPUK believes that it has strong defenses to, and intends to vigorously contest, the claims by Celtique. However, due to the early stage of this matter and the uncertainty and risks inherent in litigation, the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter and believes that a meaningful estimate of a reasonably possible loss, if any, or range of reasonably possible losses, if any, cannot currently be made.
Poplar CO2-EOR Pilot Bonus. MI3 Petroleum Engineering ("MI3") is a Golden, Colorado, based petroleum engineering firm that advises the Company with respect to its CO2-EOR activities, including the Company's CO2-EOR pilot at Poplar (See Note 16 - Related Party Transactions). Pursuant to the terms of a master services contract with MI3, in addition to contracted rates for services performed, certain contingent bonuses may become payable to MI3. The first of these will become payable upon a decision by the Company to pursue a full-field CO2-EOR development at Poplar and is estimated at $255 thousand as of March 31, 2015. The remainder of the bonuses are based on triggers related to project funding and full-field production rates.