Fair Value Measurements
|12 Months Ended|
Jun. 30, 2015
|Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]|
|Fair Value Measurements||
Note 7 - Fair Value Measurements
The Company follows authoritative guidance related to fair value measurement and disclosure, which establishes a three level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy categorizes assets and liabilities measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the observability of the inputs employed in the measurement using market participant assumptions at the measurement date. A financial instrument's categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:
The Company's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and the consideration of factors specific to the asset or liability. The Company's policy is to recognize transfers in or out of a fair value hierarchy as of the end of the reporting period for which the event or change in circumstances caused the transfer. The Company has consistently applied the valuation techniques discussed above for all periods presented. During the years ended June 30, 2015, and 2014, there have been no transfers in or out of Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3.
Assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis
The Company's financial instruments exposed to concentrations of credit risk primarily consist of cash and cash equivalents. The carrying values for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities reflect theses items' cost, which approximates fair value based on the timing of the anticipated cash flows and current market conditions. The recorded value of the Term Loan (see Note 5 - Debt), approximates fair value due to its variable interest rate structure.
The following table presents items required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis by the level in which they are classified within the valuation hierarchy as follows:
The contingent consideration payable is a standalone liability that is measured at fair value on a recurring basis for which there is no available quoted market price, principal market, or market participants. The inputs for this instrument are unobservable and therefore classified as Level 3 inputs. The calculation of this liability is a significant management estimate and uses drilling and production projections based in part on the Company's reserve report for NP to estimate future production bonus payments and a discount rate that is reflective of the Company's credit adjusted borrowing rate.
Inputs are reviewed by management on an annual basis or more frequently as deemed appropriate, and the liability is estimated by converting estimated future production bonus payments to a single net present value using a discounted cash flow model. Payments of future production bonuses are sensitive to Poplar's 60 days rolling gross production average. The contingent consideration payable would increase with significant production increases and/or a reduction in the discount rate.
Revisions to the fair value estimate of the contingent consideration payable are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations under fair value revision of contingent consideration payable. Accretion expense related to the contingent consideration payable is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations under net interest expense. As of June 30, 2014, the downward revisions were a result of the fact that a second production payout could not be reasonably assumed on the basis of current production estimates corresponding to the estimated proved reserves of Poplar at June 30, 2014.
The Company undertook a review of its planned drilling program at Poplar with respect to its proved undeveloped reserves as of June 30, 2015, and determined, in light of the current oil price environment and liquidity situation, to defer this drilling program for an indefinite period. Without this drilling program and the production volumes anticipated therefrom, the Company does not currently anticipate that the conditions for the payment of the contingent consideration will be met in the foreseeable future. As such, the Company has reversed the contingent consideration payable in its entirety as of June 30, 2015 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
The following table presents information about significant unobservable inputs to the contingent consideration payable measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the fiscal years ended:
The following table presents a roll forward of the contingent consideration payable for the fiscal years ended:
Assets and liabilities measured on a nonrecurring basis
The Company also utilizes fair value to perform an impairment test on its oil and gas properties and goodwill annually, or whenever events and circumstances indicate that a decline in the recoverability of their carrying values may have occurred. Fair value is estimated using expected discounted future cash flows from oil and gas properties. The inputs used to determine such fair value are primarily based upon internally developed cash flow models and are also classified within Level 3. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, the Company reviewed its proved oil and gas properties and its recorded goodwill for a possible impairment as a result of the recent decline in oil prices and the quantity of reserves due to revisions related to the exclusion of the PUD reserve estimates, and concluded that an impairment allowance of $17.4 million was required to adjust the carrying value of its proved oil and gas properties to fair value and an impairment allowance of $674 thousand was required to adjust the carrying value of its goodwill at Nautilus Poplar to fair value. The qualitative factors used in our assessment include macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, and overall financial performance. The quantitative analysis performed included a review of the June 30, 2015 reserve estimates using forward commodity prices and an estimate of the differential less the liabilities for NP, and comparing the result of the analysis to the recorded carrying value of the net assets. The analysis indicated that the carrying value of the net assets exceeded the calculated value of the reserves net of liabilities, and therefore, an impairment had occurred. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, no events or circumstances were identified that would indicate that an impairment of oil and gas properties or goodwill had occurred.
No definition available.
The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef